Prof. dr. Eric van Dijk

Functie:
  • Hoogleraar
  • Voorzitter van de sectie Sociale en Organisatiepsychologie
  • Voorzitter Wetenschapscommissie
Expertise:
  • mixed-motive behavior: e.g., social dilemmas, bargaining, coalition formation. Zie ook socialdilemma.com.
  • fairness
  • emotions and decision making
  • economic behavior and rationality: e.g., endowment effect, sunk cost effect
  • effects of uncertainty on decision making


Telefoon: +31 (0)71 527 3709
E-Mail: dijk@fsw.leidenuniv.nl
Faculteit / Onderdeel: Faculteit der Sociale Wetenschappen, Instituut Psychologie, Sociale en Organisatiepsychologie
Werkadres: Pieter de la Court gebouw
Wassenaarseweg 52
2333 AK Leiden
Kamernummer 2A25


Internationale Publicaties vanaf 2002

  • Noordewier, M.K., Topolinski, S., & Van Dijk, E. (in press). The temporal dynamics of surprise. Social and Personality Psychology Compass.
  • Wu, Y., Van Dijk, E., Aitken, M., & Clark, L. (in press). Missed losses loom larger than gains: electrodermal reactivity to decision choices and outcomes. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioural Neuroscience
  • Noordewier, M.K., & Van Dijk, E. (in press). Curiosity and time: From not knowing to almost knowing. Cognition and Emotion.
  • Steinel, W., Koning, L., Van Dijk, E., & Van Beest, I. (in press). Deception as a means to an end: An instrumental approach. In J.W. van Prooijen & P.A.M. van Lange (Eds.), Cheating, corruption, and concealment. Cambridge University Press.
  • Van Hoorn, J., Van Dijk, E., Meuwese, R., Rieffe, C., & Crone, E.A. (in press). Peer influence on prosocial behavior in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence.
  • Cramwinckel, F.M., Van den Bos, K., & Van Dijk, E. (2015). Reactions to morally motivated deviance. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 150-156.
  • Van Dijk, E., Molenmaker, W.E., & De Kwaadsteniet, E.W. (2015). Promoting cooperation in social dilemmas: the use of sanctions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 118-122.
  • Mooijman, M., Van Dijk, W.W., Ellemers, N., & Van Dijk, E. (2015). Why leaders punish: A power perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109 (1), 75-89.
  • Van Dijk, E. (2015). Social dilemmas, Psychology of. In James D. Wright (Editor-in-chief), International  Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition (Vol. 22, pp. 245-249). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Wu, Y., Van Dijk, E., & Clark, L. (2015). Near-wins and near-losses in gambling: A behavioral and facial EMG study. Psychophysiology, 52, 359-366.
  • Molenmaker, W.E., De Kwaadsteniet, E.W., & Van Dijk, E. (2014). On the willingness to costly reward cooperation and punish non-cooperation: The moderating role of type of social dilemma. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125, 175-183.
  • Steinel, W., Van Beest, I., & Van Dijk, E. (2014). Too good to be true: Suspicion-based rejections of high offers. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17, 682-698.
  • Van Prooijen, J.-W., & Van Dijk, E. (2014). When consequence size predicts belief in conspiracy theories: The moderating role of perspective taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 63-73.
  • Van Dijk, E., Mulder, L.B., & De Kwaadsteniet, E.W. (2014). For the common good? The use of sanctions in social dilemmas. In P.A.M. van Lange, B. Rockenbach, & T. Yamagishi (Eds.), Social dilemmas: New perspectives on reward and punishment (pp. 70-84). Oxford University Press.
  • Daamen, D.D.L., Gerritsen, M., Van Dijk, E. & Terwel, B., (2014). Splitting or merging information affects evaluations in an Information-Choice Questionnaire. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26, 66-84.
  • Van Putten, M., Zeelenberg, M., Van Dijk, E., & Tykocinski, O.E. (2014). Inaction inertia. European Review of Social Psychology, 24, 123-159. 
  • Van Dijk, E. (2013). The economics of prosocial behavior. In D.A. Schroeder & W. Graziano (Eds.), Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior. Oxford University Press.
  • Lelieveld, G.-J., Van Dijk, E., Van Beest, I. & Van Kleef, G.A. (2013). Does communicating disappointment in negotiations help or hurt? Solving an apparent inconsistency in the social-functional approach to emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105 , 605-620.
  • Cramwinckel, F.M., Van Dijk, E., Scheepers, D.T., & Van den Bos, K. (2013). The threat of moral refusers for one's self-concept and the protective function of physical cleansing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1049-1058.
  • Van Putten, M., Zeelenberg, M., & Van Dijk, E. (2013). How consumers deal with missed discounts: Transaction decoupling, action orientation and inaction inertia. Journal of Economic Psychology, 38, 104-110.
  • Koning, L., & Van Dijk, E. (2013). Motivated cognition in negotiation. In M. Olekalns & W.L. Adair (Eds.), Handbook of research on negotiation (pp. 46-74). Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Van Dijk, E., Parks, C.D., & Van Lange, P.A.M. (2013). Social dilemmas: The challenge of human cooperation. (Preface to special issue). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 123-124.
  • Van Lange, P.A.M., Joireman, J.A., Parks, C.D., & Van Dijk, E. (2013). The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 125-141.
  • De Kwaadsteniet, E.W., Rijkhof, S.A.M., & Van Dijk, E. (2013). Equality as a benchmark for third-party punishment and reward: The moderating role of uncertainty in social dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 251-259.
  • Lelieveld, G.-J., Van Dijk, E. Güroglu, B., Van Beest, I. Van Kleef, G.A., Rombouts, S.A.R.B., & Crone, E.A. (2013). Behavioral and neural reactions to emotions of others in the distribution of resources. Social Neuroscience, 8, 52-62.
  • Lokhorst, A. M., Werner, C., Staats, H., Van Dijk, E., & Gale, J. L. (2013). Commitment and behavior change: A meta-analysis and critical review of commitment-making strategies in environmental research. Environment and Behavior, 45, 3-34 .
  • Wu, Y., Van Dijk, E., & Zhou, X. (2013). Evaluating self- vs. other-owned objects: the modulatory role of oxytocin. Biological Psychology, 92, 179-184. 
  • Van Beest, I., Carter-Sowell, A.R., Williams, K.D., & Van Dijk, E. (2012). Groups being ostracized by groups: Is the pain shared, is recovery quicker, and are groups more likely to be aggressive? Group  Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16, 241-254.
  • De Kwaadsteniet, E.W., & Van Dijk, E. (2012). A social-psychological perspective on tacit coordination: How it works, when it works (and when it does not). European Review of Social Psychology, 23, 187-223.
  • Wubben, M. J. J., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2012). Is pride a prosocial emotion? Interpersonal effects of authentic and hubristic pride. Cognition and Emotion, 26, 1084-1097.
  • Wu, Y., Hu, J., Van Dijk, E., Leliveld, M. C., & Zhou, X. (2012). Brain activity in fairness consideration during asset distribution: Does the initial ownership play a role? PLoS ONE 7(6): e39627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039627.
  • Harinck, F., Van Beest, I., Van Dijk, E., & Van Zeeland, M. (2012). Measurement-induced focusing and the magnitude of loss aversion. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 462-471.
  • Lelieveld, G.-J., Van Dijk, E., Van Beest, I., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2012). Why anger and disappointmenrt affect other’s bargaining behavior differently: The moderating role of power and the mediating role of reciprocal and complementary emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 38, 1209-1221.
  • Stel, M., Van Dijk, E., Smith, P. K., Van Dijk, W. W., & Djalal, F. M. (2012). Lowering the pitch of your voice makes you feel more powerful and think more abstractly. Social Psychological and Personality  Science, 3, 497-502.  
  • De Kwaadsteniet, E. W., Homan, A. C., Van Dijk, E.,  & Van Beest, I. (2012). Social information as a cue for tacit coordination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 257-271.  
  • Van den Bos, W., Van Dijk, E., & Crone, E. A. (2012). Learning whom to trust in repeated social interactions: A developmental perspective. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15, 243-256
  • Leliveld, M. C., Van Dijk, E., & Van Beest, I. (2012). Punishing and compensating others at your own expense: The role of empathic concern on reactions to distributive injustice. European Journal of Social  Psychology, 42, 135-140.
  • Van Dijk, E., De Kwaadsteniet, E.W., & Koning, L.F. (2011). About behaving (un)ethically: Self-interest, deception, and fairness. In D. De Cremer, & A.E. Tenbrunsel (Eds.), Behavioral business ethics: Shaping an emerging field, 105-121. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Wu, Y., Zhou, Y., Van Dijk, E.,  Leliveld, M. C.,  & Zhou, X. (2011). Social comparison affects brain responses to fairness in asset division: An ERP study with the ultimatum game. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 131. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00131.  
  • Desmet P.T.M., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2011). Trust recovery following voluntary or forced financial compensations in the trust game: The role of trait forgiveness. Personality and Individual   Differences, 51, 267-273.
  • Raeva, D., Van Dijk, E., & Zeelenberg, M. (2011). How comparing decision outcomes affects subsequent decisions: The carry-over of a comparative mind-set. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 4, 343-350.
  • Van Beest, I., Williams, K.D., & Van Dijk, E. (2011). Cyberbomb: Effects of being ostracized from a death game. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14, 581-596. 
  • Güroglu, B., Van den Bos, W., Van Dijk, E., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A.  (2011). Dissociable brain networks involved in development of fairness considerations: Understanding intentionality behind unfairness. NeuroImage, 57, 634-641.
  • Wubben, M.J.J., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2011). The communication of anger and disappointment helps to establish cooperation through indirect reciprocity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 489-501. 
  • Lokhorst, A.M., Staats, H., Van Dijk, J., Van Dijk, E., & De Snoo, G. (2011). What's in it for me? Motivational differences between farmers' subsidized and non-subsidized nature conservation practices. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 60, 337-353. 
  • Koning, L., Steinel, W., Van Beest, I., & Van Dijk, E. (2011). Power and deception in ultimatum bargaining. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 35-42. 
  • Lelieveld, G.J., Van Dijk, E., Van Beest, I., Steinel, W., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2011). Disappointed in you, angry about your offer: Distinct negative emotions induce concessions via different mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 635-641. 
  • De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2011). On the near miss in public good dilemmas: How upward counterfactuals influence group stability when the group fails. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 139-146.
  • Van den Bos, W., Van Dijk, E., Westenberg, M., Rombouts, S.A.R.B., & Crone, E.A. (2011). Changing brains, changing perspectives: The neurocognitive development of reciprocal exchange. Psychological Science, 22, 60-70. 
  • Nelissen, R.A., Leliveld, M.C., Van Dijk, E., & Zeelenberg, M. (2011). Fear and guilt in proposers: Using emotions to explain offers in ultimatum bargaining. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 78-85.
  • Desmet, P., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2011). In money we trust? The use of financial compensations to repair trust in the aftermath of distributive harm. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114, 75-86.
  • Desmet, P.T.M., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2010). On the psychology of financial compensations to restore fairness transgressions: When intentions determine value. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 105-115. 
  • Stel, M., Van Baaren, R. B., Blascovich, J., Van Dijk, E., McCall, C., Pollmann. M. M. H., Van Leeuwen, M. L., Mastop, J., & Vonk, R. (2010). Effects of a priori liking on the elicitation of mimicry.  Experimental Psychology, 57, 412-418.
  • De Heus, P., Hoogervorst, N., & Van Dijk, E. (2010). Framing prisoners and chickens: Valence effects in the prisoner's and the chicken game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 736-742.
  • De Dreu, C.K.W., Greer, L.L., Handgraaf, M.J.J., Shalvi, S., Van Kleef, G.A., Baas, M., Ten Velden, F.S., Van Dijk, E., & Feith, S.W.W. (2010). The neuropeptide Oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science, 328, 1408-1411.
  • De Kwaadsteniet, E.W., & Van Dijk, E. (2010). Social status as a cue for tacit coordination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 515-524. 
  • Lokhorst, A.M., Van Dijk, J., Staats, H., Van Dijk, E., & De Snoo, G. (2010). Using tailored information and public commitment to improve the environmental quality of farm lands: An example from the Netherlands. Human Ecology, 38, 113-122.
  • Van Putten, M., Zeelenberg, M., & Van Dijk, E. (2010). Who throws good money after bad? Action vs. state orientation moderates the sunk cost fallacy. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 1-4. 
  • Van den Bos, W., Westenberg, M., Van Dijk, E., & Crone, E.A. (2010). Development of trust and reciprocity in adolescense. Cognitive Development, 25, 90-102.  
  • De Cremer, D., Van Dijk, E., & Pillutla, M.M. (2010). Explaining unfair offers in ultimatum games and its effecs on trust: An experimental approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 107-126.
  • Koning, L., Van Dijk, E., Van Beest, I., & Steinel, W. (2010). An instrumental account of deception and reactions to deceit in bargaining. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 57-73.
  • Van Dijk, E., Wit, A.P., Wilke, H.A.M., & De Kwaadsteniet, E.W. (2010). On the importance of equality in social dilemmas. In: R.M. Kramer, A.E. Tenbrunsel, & M.H. Bazerman (Eds.). Social decision making: Social Dilemmas, Social Values, and Ethical Judgments. (44-69) New York, Routledge.
  • De Kwaadsteniet, E.W., Van Dijk, E., Wit, A.P., & De Cremer, D. (2010). Anger and retribution after collective overuse: The role of blaming and environmental uncertainty in social dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 59-70.
  • Van Dijk, E., Leliveld, M.C., & Van Beest, I. (2009). If it walks like fairness, and quacks like fairness, it sometimes is fairness: Instrumental and true fairness in bargaining. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 155-162.
  • Van Dijk, E., & Van Beest, I. (2009). Coalitions. In: J.M. Levine, & M.A. Hogg (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. (pp. 91-93). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Lokhorst, A.M., Van Dijk, E., & Staats, H. (2009). Public commitment making as a structural solution in social dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 440-406.
  • Wubben, M., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2009). How emotion communication guides reciprocity: Establishing cooperation through disappointment and anger. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 987-990.
  • Van den Bos, W., Van Dijk, E., Westenberg, M., Rombouts, S.A.R.B., & Crone, E.A. (2009). What motivates repayment? Neural correlates of reciprocity in the trust game. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4, 294-304. 
  • De Cremer, D.,  Van Dijk, E., & Reinders Folmer, C. (2009). Why leaders feel entitled to take more: Feelings of entitlement as a moral rationalization strategy. In: D. De Cremer (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making (pp. 107-119). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  • Van Putten, M. Zeelenberg, M., & Van Dijk, E. (2009). Dealing with missed oportunities: Action vs. state orientation moderates inaction inertia. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 808-815.
  • Stouten, J., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2009). Behavioral (in)tolerance of equality violation in social dilemmas: When trust affects contribution decisions after violations of equality. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 517-531.
  • Stel, M., Van Dijk, E., & Olivier, E. (2009). You want to know the truth? Then don't mimic! Psychological Science, 20, 693-699.
  • Stouten, J., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2009). When being disadvantaged grows into vengeance: The effects of asymmetry of interest and social exclusion in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 526-539.
  • De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2009). Paying for sanctions in social dilemmas: The effects of asymmetry of endowments and accountability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 45-55.
  • Leliveld, M., Van Beest, I., Van Dijk, E. & Tenbrunsel, A.E. (2009). Understanding the influence of outcome valence in bargaining: A study on fairness accessibility, norms and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 505-514.
  • Van Dijk, E., de Kwaadsteniet, E.W., & De Cremer, D. (2009). Tacit coordination in social dilemmas: The importance of having a common understanding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 665-678.
  • Mulder, L.B., Van Dijk, E., & De Cremer, D. (2009). When sanctions that can be evaded still work: The role of trust in leaders. Social Influence, 4, 122-137.
  • Wubben, M., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2009). When and how communicated guilt affects contributions in public good dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 15-23. 
  • Van Putten, M., Zeelenberg, M., & Van Dijk (2008). Multiple options in te past and present: The impact on inaction inertia. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 519-531.
  • Handgraaf, M.J.J., Van Dijk, E., Vermunt, R.C., Wilke, H.A.M., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2008). Less power or powerless? Egocentric empathy gaps and the irony of having little versus no power in social decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1136-1149.
  • Leliveld, M. C., Van Dijk, E., & Van Beest, I. (2008). How initial ownership affects bargaining: Introducing the giving, splitting, and taking ultimatum bargaining game. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1214-1225.
  • Wubben, M.J.J., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2008). When emotions of others affect decisions in public good dilemmas: An instrumental view. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 823-835. 
  • De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2008). Leader-follower effects in resource dilemmas: the roles of leadership selection and social responsibility. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11, 355-369.
  • De Kwaadsteniet, E., Van Dijk, E., Wit, A.P., & De Cremer, D. (2008). "How many of us are there?" Group size uncertainty and social value orientations in social dilemmas. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11, 387-399.
  • Van Beest, I., Van Kleef, G.A., & Van Dijk, E. (2008). Get angry, get out: The interpersonal effects of anger in multiparty negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 993-1002.
  • De Cremer, D., Van Knippenberg, D. L., Van Dijk, E., & Van Leeuwen, E. (2008). Cooperating if one's goals are collective-based: Social identification effects in social dilemmas as a function of goal-transformation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1562-1579.
  • Van Dijk, E., Van Kleef, G. A., Steinel, W., & Van Beest, I. (2008). A social functional approach to emotions in bargaining: When communicating anger pays and when it backfires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 600-614.
  • Van Dijk, E., De Cremer, D., Mulder, L. B., & Stouten, J. (2008). How do we react to feedback in social dilemmas? In A. Biel, D. Eek, T. Gärling, & M. Gustafsson (Eds.), New issues and paradigms in research on social dilemmas. (pp. 43-56). New York: Springer Verlag.
  • Van Kleef, G. A., Van Dijk, E., Steinel, W., Harinck, F., & Van Beest, I. (2008). Anger in social conflict: Cross-situational comparisons and suggestions for the future. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17, 13-30.
  • Harinck, F., Van Dijk, E., Van Beest, I., & Mersmann, P. (2007). When gains loom larger than losses: Reversed loss aversion for small amounts of money. Psychological Science, 18, 1099-1105.
  • De Kwaadsteniet, E., Van Dijk, E., & Wit, A. P., & De Cremer, D. (2007). Justifying decisions in social dilemmas: Justification pressures and tacit coordination under environmental uncertainty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1648-1660.
  • Van Beest, I., & Van Dijk, E. (2007). Self-interest and fairness in coalition formation: A social utility approach to understanding partner selection and payoff allocations in groups. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 132-174.
  • Van Lange, P. A. M., De Cremer, D., Van Dijk, E., & Van Vugt, M., (2007). Self-interest and beyond: Basic principles of social interaction. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins & (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed, pp. 540-561). New York: Guilford.
  • Stouten, J., De Cremer, D. & Van Dijk, E. (2007). Managing equality in social dilemmas: Emotional and retributive implications. Social Justice Research, 20, 53-67.
  • Van Dijk, E., & Zeelenberg, M. (2007). When curiosity killed regret: Avoiding or seeking the unknown in decision-making under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 656-662.
  • Van Putten, M., Zeelenberg, M., & Van Dijk, E. (2007). Decoupling the past from the present attenuates inaction inertia. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20, 65-79.
  • Zeelenberg, M., Nijstad, B. A., Van Putten, M., & Van Dijk, E. (2006). Inaction inertia, regret and valuation: A closer look. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 89-104.
  • Van Dijk, E., & De Cremer, D. (2006). Self-benefiting in the allocation of scarce resources: Leader-follower effects and the moderating role of social value orientations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1352-1361.
  • Mulder, L. B., Van Dijk, E., De Cremer, D., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2006). When sanctions fail to increase cooperation in social dilemmas: Considering the presence of an alternative option to defect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 1312-1324.
  • Van Dijk, E., & De Cremer, D. (2006). Tacit coordination and social dilemmas: On the importance of self-interest and fairness. In D. De Cremer, M. Zeelenberg & J. K. Murnighan (Eds.), Social psychology and economics (pp. 141-154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • De Kwaadsteniet, E. W., Van Dijk, E., Wit, A., & De Cremer, D. (2006). Social dilemmas as strong versus weak situations: Social value orientations and tacit coordination under resource uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 509-516.
  • Stouten, J., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2006). Violating equality in social dilemmas: Emotional and retributive reactions as a function of trust, attribution, and honesty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 894-906.
  • Mulder, L. B., Van Dijk, E., & De Cremer, D. (2006). Fighting unethical behavior in organizations: The dark side of sanctions. in A. Tenbrunsel, B. Mannix, & M. Neale (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams: Ethics and groups: Vol. 8 (pp. 59-81). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Van Dijk, E., & Zeelenberg, M. (2006). The dampening effect of uncertainty on positive and negative emotions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 171-176.
  • Van Dijk, E. (2006). From social psychology to economics and back again: The benefits of a two-way street. In P. A. M. van Lange (Ed.), Bridging social psychology: Benefits of transdisciplinary approaches (pp. 409-413). Mahwah, NJ:  Erlbaum.
  • Mulder, L. B., Van Dijk, E., De Cremer, D. & Wilke, H. A. M. (2006). Undermining trust and cooperation: The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 147-162.
  • Van Dijk, E., & Tenbrunsel, A. (2005). The battle between self-interest and fairness in bargaining: Ultimatum, dictator, and delta games. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, D. P. Skarlicki, & K. Van den Bos (Eds.), What motivates fairness in organizations? [In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (Series Eds.), Research in social issues in management] (pp. 31-48). Greenwich CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Stouten, J., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2005). All is well that ends well, at least for proselfs: Emotional reactions to equality violation as a function of social value orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 767-783.
  • Van Beest, I.,  Van Dijk, E., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2005). Do-no-harm in coalition formation: Why losses inhibit exclusion and promote fairness cognitions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 609-617.
  • Stouten, J., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2005). I'm doing the best I can (for myself): Leadership and variance of harvesting in resource dilemmas. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9, 205-211
  • Zeelenberg, M., & Van Dijk, E. (2005). On the comparative nature of regret. In Mandel, D. R., Hilton, D. J., & Catellani, P. (Eds.), The psychology of counterfactual thinking [In P. Robinson (Series Ed.), Routledge Research International Series in Social Psychology] (pp. 147-161). London: Routledge.
  • De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2005). When and why leaders put themselves first: Leader behaviour in resource allocations as a function of feeling entitled. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 553-563.
  • Van Dijk, E., & Zeelenberg, M. (2005). On the psychology of 'if only': Regret and the comparison between factual and counterfactual outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 152-160.
  • Mulder, L. B., Van Dijk, E., Wilke, H., & De Cremer, D. (2005). The effect of feedback on support for a sanctioning system in a social dilemma: The difference between installing and maintaining the sanction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 443-458.
  • Van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Van Dijk, E. (2005). Buying and selling exchange goods: Outcome feedback, curiosity and the endowment effect. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 459-468.
  • Van Dijk, E., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2005). Wanna trade? Product knowledge and the perceived differences between the gains and losses of trade. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 23-34.
  • Van Dijk, E., De Cremer, D., & Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2004). Social value orientations and the strategic use of fairness in ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 697-707.
  • Van Dijk, E., Wit, A., Wilke, H., & Budescu, D. V.  (2004). What we know (and do not know) about the effects of uncertainty on behavior in social dilemmas. In Suleiman, R., Budescu, D. V., Fischer, I., & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Contemporary psychological research on social dilemmas (pp. 315-331). Cambridge University Press.
  • Wit. A., Van Dijk, E., Wilke, H., & Groenenboom, A. (2004). The interplay between environmental and social uncertainty in social dilemmas. In Suleiman, R., Budescu, D. V., Fischer, I., & Messick, D. M. (Eds.), Contemporary psychological research on social dilemmas (pp. 376-398). Cambridge University Press.
  • Handgraaf, M. J. J., Van Dijk, E., Wilke, H. A. M., & Vermunt, R. C. (2004). Evaluability of outcomes in ultimatum bargaining. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, 97-106.
  • Van Beest, I., Van Dijk, E., & Wilke, H. (2004). Resources and alternatives in coalition bargaining: The effects on payoff, self-serving behaviour, and bargaining length. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 713-728.
  • Van Beest, I., Van Dijk, E., & Wilke, H. (2004). The interplay of self-interest and fairness in coalition formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 547-565.
  • Van Dijk, E., & Zeelenberg, M. (2003). The discounting of ambiguous information in economic decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 341-352.
  • Handgraaf, M. J. J., Van Dijk, E., & De Cremer, D. (2003). Social utility in ultimatum bargaining. Social Justice Research, 16, 263-283.
  • De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2003). Fairness and ethics in social decision-making. Social Justice Research, 16, 191-194.
  • Van Vugt, M., Dowding, K.,  John, P., & Van Dijk, E.  (2003). The exit of residential mobility or the voice of political action? Strategies for problem-solving in residential communities. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 321-338.
  • Handgraaf, M. J. J., Van Dijk, E., Wilke, H. A. M., & Vermunt, R. (2003). The salience of a recipient’s alternatives: Inter- and intrapersonal comparison in ultimatum games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 165-177.
  • Van Dijk, E., Wilke, H., & Wit, A. (2003). Preferences for leadership in social dilemmas: Public good dilemmas versus resource dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 170-176.
  • Van Beest, I., Wilke, H. A. M., & Dijk, E. van (2003). The excluded player in coalition formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 237-247.
  • De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2002). Perceived criticality and contributions in public good dilemmas: A matter of feeling responsible to all? Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 319-332.
  • De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2002). Reactions to group success and failure as a function of group identification: A test of the goal-transformation hypothesis in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 435-442.
  • Zeelenberg, M., Van den Bos, K., Van Dijk, E., & Pieters, R. G. M. (2002). The inaction effect in the psychology of regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 314-327

Overige werkzaamheden

2010 - 2015: Bestuurslid bij het Nationaal Instituut voor Budgetvoorlichting (NIBUD)
2009 - 2013: Associate Editor British Journal of Social Psychology
2012 - heden: Associate Editor Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

More Information about the Department of Social & Organizational Psychology

Zie ook Socialdilemma.com.

Voor meer info over de Sectie Sociale en Organisatiepsychologie (in het Engels), ga naar de website S&O.

For more information about the Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, please visit the website S&O.

Laatst Gewijzigd: 04-01-2016