Prof.dr. Henk Wilke

Functie:
  • Professor Emeritus
Expertise:
  • Experimental social psychology, decision making and organizational behavior




Contact information:

 T home: +31 (0)71 5152109 and +31 (0)51 2461364

Email home: Henk_wilke@zonnet.nl

Home address: D. van Swietenlaan 4, 2342 BE Oegstgeest

History

Henk Wilke (1940) received his PhD (1968) from Utrecht University; he was research fellow at Dartmouth College (1968-1969), visiting professor of UCSB (1980-1981) and the University of Stellenbosch (1993). From 1973 until 1989 he was professor of social psychology at Groningen University and from 1989 until 2001 at Leiden University; thereafter he retired.

Publications

  • Van Dijk, E., Wit, A.P., Wilke, H.A.M., & De Kwaadsteniet, E.W. (2010). On the importance of equality in social dilemmas. In: R.M. Kramer, A.E. Tenbrunsel, & M.H. Bazerman (Eds.). Social decision making: Social Dilemmas, Social Values, and Ethical Judgments. (44-69) New York, Routledge.
  • Handgraaf, M.J.J., Van Dijk, E., Vermunt, R.C., Wilke, H.A.M., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2008). Less power or powerless? Egocentric empathy gaps and the irony of having little versus no power in social decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1136-1149.
  • Mulder, L. B., Van Dijk, E., De Cremer, D., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2006). When sanctions fail to increase cooperation in social dilemmas: Considering the presence of an alternative option to defect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 1312-1324.
  • Mulder, L. B., Van Dijk, E., De Cremer, D. & Wilke, H. A. M. (2006). Undermining trust and cooperation: The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 147-162.
  • Van Beest, I.,  Van Dijk, E., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2005). Do-no-harm in coalition formation: Why losses inhibit exclusion and promote fairness cognitions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 609-617.
  • Mulder, L. B., Van Dijk, E., Wilke, H., & De Cremer, D. (2005). The effect of feedback on support for a sanctioning system in a social dilemma: The difference between installing and maintaining the sanction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 443-458.
  • Van Dijk, E., Wit, A., Wilke, H., & Budescu, D. V.  (2004). What we know (and do not know) about the effects of uncertainty on behavior in social dilemmas. In Suleiman, R., Budescu, D. V., Fischer, I., & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Contemporary psychological research on social dilemmas (pp. 315-331). Cambridge University Press.
  • Wit. A., Van Dijk, E., Wilke, H., & Groenenboom, A. (2004). The interplay between environmental and social uncertainty in social dilemmas. In Suleiman, R., Budescu, D. V., Fischer, I., & Messick, D. M. (Eds.), Contemporary psychological research on social dilemmas (pp. 376-398). Cambridge University Press.
  • Handgraaf, M. J. J., Van Dijk, E., Wilke, H. A. M., & Vermunt, R. C. (2004). Evaluability of outcomes in ultimatum bargaining. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, 97-106.
  • Van Beest, I., Van Dijk, E., & Wilke, H. (2004). Resources and alternatives in coalition bargaining: The effects on payoff, self-serving behaviour, and bargaining length. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 713-728.
  • Van Beest, I., Van Dijk, E., & Wilke, H. (2004). The interplay of self-interest and fairness in coalition formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 547-565.
  • Handgraaf, M. J. J., Van Dijk, E., Wilke, H. A. M., & Vermunt, R. (2003). The salience of a recipient’s alternatives: Inter- and intrapersonal comparison in ultimatum games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 165-177.
  • Van Dijk, E., Wilke, H., & Wit, A. (2003). Preferences for leadership in social dilemmas: Public good dilemmas versus resource dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 170-176.
  • Van Beest, I., Wilke, H. A. M., & Dijk, E. van (2003). The excluded player in coalition formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 237-247.

 

Voor meer info over de Sectie Sociale en Organisatiepsychologie (in het Engels), ga naar de website S&O.

For more information about the Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, please visit the website S&O.

Laatst Gewijzigd: 29-06-2010